How International Law Works

If you want to understand how international law works, this guide explains the subject in straightforward terms. International law governs relations among states and increasingly between states, international organizations, corporations, and individuals. It is created through treaties, customary practice, and general legal principles. And it is enforced through a mix of courts, dispute-settlement mechanisms, political measures, and domestic implementation. Below is a practical, accurate overview of the process of law-making, how norms gain force, the institutional routes for enforcement, and the limits that shape international legal order.

Overview — what we mean by “how international law works”

When people ask how international law works, they want to know two things: (1) how rules are produced (the sources and processes of law-making), and (2) how those rules are applied and enforced across borders. Unlike domestic law, there is no single global legislature or global police force. Instead, states consent to rules (or are bound by customary practices) and a diverse architecture. Courts, arbitration panels, UN bodies, and domestic courts—implements and enforces those rules. Understanding that architecture clarifies both the strengths and the limits of international law.

Sources: treaties, customary international law, and general principles

Three sources form the backbone of how international law works:

Treaties and conventions — Written agreements between states (bilateral or multilateral) are the most direct source. Treaties set explicit obligations and often create institutions or procedures for implementation and dispute resolution. Once a treaty enters into force, it binds the parties that have consented and ratified it, under the principle pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept).
Customary international law — Custom arises from consistent state practice accompanied by opinio juris (a belief that the practice is legally required). Examples include norms against piracy or the basic rules of diplomatic immunity. Custom fills gaps where no treaty exists and can bind states even if they never signed a specific treaty—provided they have not persistently objected during the formation phase.
General principles of law — When treaties and custom are absent, international tribunals may apply general principles recognized by domestic legal systems (for example, principles of fairness, estoppel, or res judicata). Subsidiary sources—judicial decisions and the writings of respected scholars—help courts interpret and develop rules.

Treaty formation — negotiation, consent, and entry into force

A typical treaty lifecycle illustrates an essential part of how international law works:

Negotiation: States (often with experts and international organizations) draft text and negotiate terms.
Adoption and signature: Once negotiators agree, the text is adopted and opened for signature. Signature signals political commitment but does not always create legal obligation.
Ratification/consent to be bound: Domestic procedures then follow (legislative approval, executive action, or other constitutionally required steps). Ratification is the usual form of formal consent to be bound.
Entry into force: Treaties specify when they become binding—often after a certain number of ratifications or on a fixed date.
Implementation and reservations: States may make reservations (narrowing obligations) unless the treaty forbids them. Domestic laws or regulations then implement treaty obligations where required.

This formal consent model makes treaties the clearest example of how international law works through state agreement.

How customary law forms — practice plus belief

Customary norms form differently. Two elements are required: consistent state practice (repeated actions by states over time) and opinio juris (the conviction that the practice is legally required). For instance, the prohibition on genocide and basic principles of humanitarian law have become customary through widespread state practice and conviction about their legal character. Proving custom can be complex and fact-specific, which explains why courts and scholars carefully analyze diplomatic practice, national legislation, and official statements.

Enforcement mechanisms — courts, arbitration, and political tools

Enforcement is the trickiest part of how international law works because it relies heavily on state cooperation:

International courts and tribunals: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) resolves disputes between states that consent to its jurisdiction. Specialized tribunals—such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) for individual criminal responsibility or arbitration panels under the World Trade Organization (WTO)—apply specific regimes. These forums produce binding decisions for consenting parties and help interpret obligations.
Arbitration and ad hoc tribunals: States and private parties frequently use arbitration for investment disputes and commercial conflicts; arbitral awards are widely enforceable under treaty regimes like the New York Convention.
Domestic courts: Many countries incorporate international law into domestic systems; national courts may apply treaties and customary rules and thereby enforce international obligations locally.
Political and economic measures: Sanctions, diplomatic pressure, and Security Council resolutions (under Chapter VII of the UN Charter) are political enforcement tools. While they can be powerful, their use is often shaped by geopolitical interests.
Countermeasures and state responsibility: When a state breaches an obligation, other states may lawfully respond with proportionate measures (countermeasures) to induce compliance, subject to legal limits. The law of state responsibility sets out damages, cessation, and non-repetition remedies.

Limits and practical realities: consent, power, and implementation

Explaining how international law works also requires acknowledging limits:

Consent and sovereignty: States remain primary authors and enforcers of rules, and they can withdraw consent or limit jurisdiction. (e.g., by not accepting ICJ jurisdiction).
Power politics: Enforcement effectiveness often tracks political power and willingness to act; powerful states may shape interpretations or resist enforcement.
Compliance and capacity: Even when obligations exist, compliance depends on domestic capacity, political will, and sometimes resources. Implementation gaps are common in areas like environmental law or human-rights enforcement.

The role of nonstate actors and soft law

Nonstate actors—international organizations, NGOs, multinational corporations, and civil society—play increasing roles in norm development and monitoring. “Soft law” instruments (declarations, guidelines, codes of conduct) shape expectations and can pave the way for binding obligations. Understanding how international law works today means recognizing this broader ecosystem.

Final takeaways — practical reading and where to follow developments

To follow how international law works in practice, consult primary sources. Treaty texts, ICJ judgments, WTO dispute reports, and UN resolutions. Authoritative collections (treaty databases, international court websites, and the UN Treaty Series) provide primary documents. For accessible commentary, look to reputable textbooks and reports from intergovernmental bodies and major legal journals.

Understanding how international law works helps citizens, lawyers, and policymakers evaluate global disputes, interpret obligations, and assess the prospects for compliance and enforcement. While international law cannot replicate a sovereign policing state, it provides a durable, rule-based framework for cooperation, dispute resolution, and accountability across borders.

Follow TNN for more world news, and latest us news, canada news today.